Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2008)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided September 16, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representative Roan:

This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question:

Do the provisions of 70 O.S.Supp. 2007, § 3311[ 70-3311](E)(2)(b), 1 which describe the psychological evaluation required before any person can be certified as a police or peace officer in this State, relieve Oklahoma psychologists from the duty to comply with any of the relevant rules, regulations, or ethical obligations imposed upon them by the Psychologists Licensing Act, 59 O.S. 2001 Supp. 2007, §§ 1351-1376, when participating in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Oklahoma State Department of Health v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Phillips v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. Corr v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. Southern Oklahoma Resource Center v. SparksCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API