William O. WATKINS, William R. Mallory, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SVERDRUP TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Chief Judge: .
Appellants William Watkins and William Mallory challenge the district court’s entry of judgment as a matter of law on their claims of discriminatory discharge in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1) (1994). Finding no substantial conflict in the evidence that appellee Sverdrup Technology, Inc., terminated Watkins and Mallory under a bona fide — albeit unconventional — reduction-in-force plan that age did not motivate, we affirm.
I. FACTS 1
Sverdrup is a support services independent contractor of the federal government. It…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Combs v. Plantation PatternsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Vernon EARLEY and Garey Noe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Myra J. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONSBANK OF FLORIDA N.A., a Florida Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Mary B. GRIGSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Alexander v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Vicki G. Paluck v. Gooding Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Richard Thorn and Pat Curran v. Sundstrand Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Henry Lee Leroy Pickett v. Iowa Beef ProcessorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- J.A. Beaver v. Rayonier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.