Legal Opinion

Lankford v. Holton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 3, 1949No. 32314PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In order for the plaintiff in the instant case to be entitled to recover the rents and profits as money had and received which form the basis of his action, as assignee of Mrs. Mattie L. Lankford, it must appear from the petition that she, in the absence of assignment thereof, was entitled to said rents and profits. Of course he got no better title to the rents and profits than Mrs. Lankford had. In Lankford v. Holton, 195 Ga. 317, 334, 335, 336, in dealing with the title to the same land, the rents and profits from which, as money had and received, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Petty v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Sudderth v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Terre Haute National Bank v. Horne-Andrews Commission Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Speir v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Rahal v. TitusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. American Liberty Insurance v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Washburn v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Booker v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API