Petty v. City of Atlanta

1. Under tlie rulings of the Supreme Court in Cornelisen v. City of Atlanta, 146 Ga. 416 (91 S. E. 415), where a city, in the maintenance of a park intended primarily for the promotion of the pleasure and health of the public at large, provides therein a swimming pool to be used for the same purpose, it is not responsible in damages for the negligent condition of an adjunct of the swimming pool, although a purely incidental profit might result from the operation thereof, and the city would have no authority to 'operate the swimming pool mainly as a source of revenue, in the absence of charter…