Legal Opinion
United States v. Mark W. Fruth
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 23, 1994No. 93-3690PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ASPEN, District Judge.
Following a jury trial, Mark Fruth was convicted of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). Prior to Fruth’s sentencing, the government disclosed that it had obtained information after the trial which suggested that a government witness had testified falsely. On the basis of this revelation, Fruth filed motions for a new trial and to disclose the identity of the DEA informant who had provided the government with the impeaching information. The district court denied both motions, and Fruth now appeals that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. John Anthony OliverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Charles W. BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. George Jackson and James JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Willie J. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Guy J. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Antonino Cusimano and Philip DucatoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Charles WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Bob BrumleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Dickson VerasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.