Sherman B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A father challenges the superior court's decision to terminate his parental rights, arguing that the court's conclusions were not supported by clear and convincing evidence, that termination was not in the best interests of the child, and that the court improperly considered certain facts. Because the record supports the superior court's decision to terminate the father's parental rights, and because the superior court properly considered the record as a whole, we affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
A. Facts
1. Darcy's birth
Darcy M. was born cocaine- and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Maisy W. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Barbara P. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Brynna B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Martin N. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Chloe O. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Philip J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Chloe v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Sherman B. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Sylvia v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.