First State Bank of Lamont v. Ware
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Grant County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by the First State Bank of Lamont against W. L. Ware and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action in replevin, commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendant in error, W. L. Ware, one of the defendants below. After the commencement of the action, the defendants in error Frank Clancy and M. W. Clancy filed their application to be made parties defendant therein, which was granted. Thereafter the) defendant W. L. Ware demurred to the petition on the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Ware, which demurrer was sustained by the court, whereupon the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- P.D. Casper v. Glen M. Neubert, of the Estate of Gerald L. Reasor, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- First Nat. Bank v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Murrell v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- State Exchange Bank v. Purcell Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Opinion No. 79-337 (1979) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1979