Legal Opinion

State Exchange Bank v. Purcell Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1923No. 11120PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

Plaintiff in error filed its suit in replevin against H, G. Rogers and the Purcell Bank & Trust Company, as defendants, for possession .of certain cattle and damages for the unlawful detention of the same. The defendant R. G- Rogers made no defense, and judgment was rendered against him in favor of the plaintiff by default. The Purcell Bank & Trust Company filed its answer, asserting the right to the possession of the cattle by reason of a lien against the cattle for feed and pasture for the said cattle furnished at the request of R. G. Rogers and with the consent of the plaintiff. Judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Litz v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Smith-Wogan Hardware & Imp. Co. v. BiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. First State Bank of Lamont v. WareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Nicholson v. BynumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eastwood v. GloverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API