Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 24, 1994No. Nos. 92 Civ. 8758 (MEL), 92 Civ. 8759 (MEL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DOLINGER, United States Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiffs in this product liability action allege that Atex, Inc. and its then-parent Eastman Kodak Company failed to warn them and their employers of the dangers of certain uses of computer keyboards manufactured by Atex. As a result, plaintiffs say that they now suffer from some form of repetitive stress injury, for which they seek compensation from both companies.

In the course of early pre-trial discovery, plaintiffs served document demands on Kodak that requested, inter alia:

12. All documents relating to defendant’s first…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Four Star Capital Corp. v. Nynex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Nagele v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
  3. Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  4. Tartaglia v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  5. In re In-Store Advertising Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API