Legal Opinion
Levai v. Law
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 2007No. 06-16108PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Mary Pokrajac Levai appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Hale v. Norton, 476 F.3d 694, 697 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the action because the complaint asserts no valid basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction. See Miguel v. Country Funding Corp., 309 F.3d 1161, 1164 (9th Cir.2002) (“The party asserting federal jurisdiction has the burden of establishing it.”); see also Adelt v. Richmond Sch.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Miguel v. Country Funding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Adelt v. Richmond School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Hale v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
3Cited by1 opinion
- Iyonsi v. Honolulu Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019