Legal Opinion

Adelt v. Richmond School District

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1971No. 25703PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing her complaint without leave to amend. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s allegations affirmatively show a lack of federal jurisdiction of her claim. Diversity is non-existent— the parties all are citizens and residents of California. Nor is the action one which “arises under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States” and hence within the purview of 28 U. S.C. § 1331(a). To the contrary (and despite plaintiff’s conclusionary characterization of defendants’ acts as viola-tive of due process and equal protection, etc.) the claim…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adelt v. Richmond School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. Kashkool v. ChertoffDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  3. Charles T. Sanders v. Independent School District No. I-2, of Kiowa County, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  5. Eloise Adelt v. Richmond School District, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API