Legal Opinion
Hale v. Norton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 5, 2007No. 03-36032PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
476 F.3d 694
Robert HALE; Joshua Hale; Nava S. Sunstar; Butterfly Sunstar, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Gale NORTON, Secretary of the Interior; Gary Candelaria, Superintendent, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve;
Hunter Sharp, Chief Ranger, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve; Department of the Interior; National Park Service; Fran Mainella, Director of the National Park Service; Marcia Blaszak, Acting Regional Director of the National Park Service; all in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees,
National Parks Conservation Association; The Wilderness Society; Alaska…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane County, UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. David WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Levai v. LawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Brent v. DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007