Succession of Thompson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Justice.
Alleging itself to be a creditor of the Succession of Harry A. Thompson in the sum of $2260.32, Cicero A. Ramsey, Inc., opposed the final account of the executrix, Mrs. Harry A. Thompson. The executrix filed exceptions of no cause or right of action and prescription to the opposition. Without passing on the plea of prescription, the trial judge maintained the exception of no cause of action. The matter is now before us for review upon the application of the opponent.
Opponent alleges in its opposition that, as of the date of incorporation, it was assigned certain accounts by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davis v. Arkansas Southern R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- White v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Ruddock Orleans Cypress Co. v. De LuppeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Outdoor Electric Advertising, Inc. v. SaurageSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Hunter v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF INCANATE WORDLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Cipriano v. Superior Realty & Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Merchants Adjustment Bureau v. MaltaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.