Legal Opinion

Succession of Thompson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 28, 1938No. 35000PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

Alleging itself to be a creditor of the Succession of Harry A. Thompson in the sum of $2260.32, Cicero A. Ramsey, Inc., opposed the final account of the executrix, Mrs. Harry A. Thompson. The executrix filed exceptions of no cause or right of action and prescription to the opposition. Without passing on the plea of prescription, the trial judge maintained the exception of no cause of action. The matter is now before us for review upon the application of the opponent.

Opponent alleges in its opposition that, as of the date of incorporation, it was assigned certain accounts by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Arkansas Southern R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. White v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. Ruddock Orleans Cypress Co. v. De LuppeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Outdoor Electric Advertising, Inc. v. SaurageSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  3. Hunter v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF INCANATE WORDLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Cipriano v. Superior Realty & Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. Merchants Adjustment Bureau v. MaltaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API