Legal Opinion

Ruddock Orleans Cypress Co. v. De Luppe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 21, 1907No. 16,650PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action by the Ruddock Orleans Cypress-Company against Charles De Luppe and others. Petition dismissed, and judgment affirmed by the Court of Appeal, and plaintiff" applies for certiorari or writ of review.-

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

Plaintiff, a judgment creditor of" Chas. De Luppe, sued him and his daughter, Miss Marie De Luppe, for the purpose-of recovering judgment decreeing that a certain lot of ground in the city of New Orleans, standing on the records in the name-of Marie De Luppe, belonged in full ownership to Chas. De Luppe and was subject to-his debts and to execution against him.

The petition was dismissed in the eivii district court on an exception of no cause of *953.action, and thereupon plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeal, which affirmed the Judgment.

It appears from the petition that in January, 1906, Mrs.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoffmann v. AckermannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. State v. FuentesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1850

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Succession of ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Hensley v. Government Emp. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Landreneau v. PerronLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Succession of HoghSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  5. Hoffman v. AllnetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API