State v. Robinette
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 80 Ohio St.3d 234.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. ROBINETTE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Robinette (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 234.] Criminal law—Motor vehicles—Continued detention of a person stopped for a traffic violation constitutes an illegal seizure, when—Totality-of-the- circumstances test is controlling in an unlawful detention to determine whether permission to search a vehicle is voluntary—Requirements for consent to be considered an independent act of free will. 1. When a police officer’s objective justification to continue…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Township of Bainbridge v. Kaseda, 2007-G-2797 (5-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Watts, 21982 (5-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. NeelyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. CruzOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.