Legal Opinion

State v. Robinette

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1997No. 1994-1143PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 80 Ohio St.3d 234.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. ROBINETTE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Robinette (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 234.] Criminal law—Motor vehicles—Continued detention of a person stopped for a traffic violation constitutes an illegal seizure, when—Totality-of-the- circumstances test is controlling in an unlawful detention to determine whether permission to search a vehicle is voluntary—Requirements for consent to be considered an independent act of free will. 1. When a police officer’s objective justification to continue…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Township of Bainbridge v. Kaseda, 2007-G-2797 (5-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. Watts, 21982 (5-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. NeelyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. CruzOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API