Legal Opinion

State v. McCorkle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1999No. 66275-4PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is the companion case to State v. Ford, 137 Wn.2d 472, 973 P.2d 452 (1999). Like Ford, this case raises the question whether failure to specifically object at sentencing to the classification of prior out-of-state convictions waives the issue on direct appeal.

The Court of Appeals held that failure to specifically object did not waive the issue on appeal. Finding the evidence insufficient to determine whether any of the disputed convictions were properly included in the defendant’s offender score, the Court of Appeals remanded for an eviden-tiary hearing, and for resentencing based…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MailWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. United States v. HammoudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  3. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. NitschCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API