Legal Opinion

Grooms v. Ponderosa Inn

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1997No. 96-594PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Lindia Grooms (Grooms) appeals from the order and judgment entered by the Workers’ Compensation Court which rejected her constitutional challenges to certain Occupational Disease Act statutes and dismissed her petition. We affirm.

We address the following issues on appeal:

1. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in concluding that Grooms’ right to due process was not violated when the State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund determined that her claim should be processed under the Occupational Disease Act of Montana?

2. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in concluding that Grooms’ right…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lyng v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Caekaert v. State Compensation Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Stordalen v. Ricci's Food FarmMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Heisler v. Hines Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Powell v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Powder River County v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Schmill v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Montana Media, Inc. v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API