Legal Opinion
Quincy NORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1990No. 87-2065PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
Quincy Norris, who is black, applied for a position as a cable splicer with the Department of Electricity of the City and County of San Francisco (the City). He took a civil service exam and was placed on a posted list of eligible candidates, but his application was eventually denied. Norris brought suit, alleging that the City unlawfully denied him employment because of his race in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. After a four day bench trial, the court entered judgment for the City and Norris timely appealed. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Melvin Buckingham v. United States of America, United States Postal Service, and Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Schmidt v. Safeway Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1994
- Nancy Mardell v. Harleysville Life Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Computer Task Group, Inc. v. Brotby (In Re Brotby)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.