Legal Opinion
United States v. Fred Michael Conti
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1964No. 15746_1PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHACKELFORD MILLER, Jr., Circuit Judge.
The defendant, Fred Michael Conti, was indicted for entering the Oakwood Branch of the City Bank Company, Lorain, Ohio, with intent to commit a felony or larceny, in violation of Section 2113(a), Title 18, United States Code. He entered a plea of not guilty, waived trial by jury, and the case was tried to the court without a jury. The District Judge found the defendant guilty and sentenced him to imprisonment for a period of 9 years and 5 months, from which judgment this appeal was taken.
The Government introduced evidence showing that at approximately…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Marvin Stone (83-5015), (84-5167), Edwin Driggers (83-5016)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- State v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. Orville E. Stifel, IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.