Legal Opinion

Olson v. McRae

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1964No. 371PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

In answer to special interrogatories, a jury found that appellants had dedicated for public use a right of way across their lands. Appellants contend that they were entitled to judgment because evidence of their intent to dedicate a right of way was insufficient to justify submitting the case to the jury.

In Hamerly v. Denton 1 we said that there is a dedication when the owner of an interest in land transfers- to the public a privilege of use of such interest for a public purpose, and that the intention of the land owner to dedicate must be clearly and unequivocally manifested…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Ahlstrom v. CummingsAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. DeArmond v. Alaska State Development CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hamerly v. DentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Whittier v. Whittier Fuel & Marine Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Preferred General Agency of Alaska, Inc. v. RaffettoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Sloan v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Otis Elevator Company v. McLaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API