Legal Opinion
Savre v. Independent School District No. 283
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 17, 2002No. C4-01-1229PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
Relator seeks review by writ of certiora-ri of respondent school district’s decision under Minn.Stat. § 122A.40, subd. 5(a) (2000), not to renew her teaching contract. She argues that the district based its decision on an error of law because it failed to provide her with three written evaluations each year. Because the district did not renew relator’s contract for budgetary reasons, and the district otherwise substantially complied with the statute, we affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Independent School District No. 283 (the district) contracted with relator Lori Savre as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Sullivan v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Pearson v. Independent School District No. 716Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Skeim v. Independent School District No. 115Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christopher v. Windom Area School BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Riehm v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Sorenson v. Life Style, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Joann Karetov, Relator v. Independent School District No. 283, St. Louis Park, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015