Legal Opinion

Palma v. Verex Assurance, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1996No. 95-20034PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. PARKER, Circuit Judge:

I. FACTS

On November 28, 1983, plaintiff-appellant Nancy Palma (“Palma”) borrowed $121,300 from City Federal Savings & Loan (“City Federal”) to purchase a condominium. As a condition of the loan, Palma was required to purchase mortgage insurance to protect City Federal from a loss in the event she defaulted on the loan. The mortgage insurance was purchased by City Federal from defendant-appellee Verex Assurance, Inc. (“Verex”). The premiums were paid with Palma’s money, which had been placed in an escrow account.

Palma lived in the condominium until November of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Hudson Energy Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. National Bankers Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wagner v. TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  2. In Re New England Mutual Life Insurance Co. Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  3. Deerman v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
  4. Javier Alvarado v. Lexington Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  5. In Re Van Blarcum, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API