Legal Opinion
Cone v. Drohat
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 2, 1952No. 152PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.
This is an action of tort for the conversion of attached property. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. After verdict the plaintiff moved for judgment and for a certified execution. The motion for judgment was granted and that for a certified execution was denied. The plaintiff excepted to the denial of the latter motion and the only question here to be decided is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant that motion.
On October 15, 1948, the plaintiff, chief of police of Bennington, served a writ on the defendant in an action of contract brought by the R. T. Platka Fuel Co., Inc.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Benway v. HooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Judd v. ChallouxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
- Mangan, Adm'x v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Economou v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Pettengill v. New Hampshire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Peck v. PattersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- Peoples Trust Co. v. TrahanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976