Legal Opinion

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 5, 1991No. 311-89 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HODGES, Judge.

The President of the United States asked E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company (DuPont) to perform a vital service in 1950: *636to design, construct, and operate a facility for nuclear production for the nation’s defense program. DuPont’s response was the Savannah River Plant near Aiken, South Carolina.

For various reasons, plaintiff did not want to make a profit from the Savannah River project, but it did not want to bear any losses either. The result was an unusual contract whereby the United States agreed to indemnify DuPont from virtually all costs and expenses of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arizona ex rel. Arizona Department of Transportation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  2. Thanet Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  4. George Hyman Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Craft MacHine Works, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Conoco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  3. Linda Newman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Huna Totem Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  5. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API