Legal Opinion
Dayco Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 17, 1966No. 16215_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.
The petition of Dayco Corporation of Dayton, Ohio, asks our review of a decision of the Federal Trade Commission which found that it was violating Section 2(a) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a), by selling like products to competing sellers at different prices and violating Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45, by entering into agreements to fix resale prices. The FTC’s complaint was filed October 1, 1959, and its final order, which in part adopted a Hearing Examiner’s initial decision, was entered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Brite Manufacturing Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- C. F. Braun & Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Shreve Equipment, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Clay Equipment Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United Air Lines, Inc., British Airways Plc, Intervening v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Frontier Airlines, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Brock v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.