Legal Opinion
United Air Lines, Inc., British Airways Plc, Intervening v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Frontier Airlines, Inc., Intervening
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 3, 1985No. 84-1877, 84-2351, 84-2719, 84-2835 and 84-3018PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
We have consolidated petitions to review two rules (containing three contested regulations) issued by the Civil Aeronautics Board concerning the computerized reservation systems that several airlines provide to travel agencies. 14 C.F.R. Parts 255, 256. Although the Board has since gone out of business as a result of the deregulation of the airline industry, the authority under which these rules were issued survived the deregulation and has been transferred to the Department of Transportation, which will be administering the rules if we uphold them. (To simplify…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Virginia Ragon Achacoso-Sanchez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Mutual Hospital InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Sabre, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Tommy R. Schroeder v. Hamilton School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.