Kell v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
1. “The time to be allowed counsel to prepare for trial is in the sound discretion of the trial judge; and his discretion will not be interfered with by this court, unless abused. No unusual or intricate matter of law or fact appearing, there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for continuance upon the ground of want of time to prepare for trial.” Kelloy v. State, 151 Ga. 551 (107 S. E. 488); Harris v. State, 152 Ga. 193 (108 S. E. 377); Ivey v. State, 154 Ga. 63 (113 S. E. 175); Gore v. State, 155 Ga. 642 (118 S. E. 40); Waters v. State, 158 Ga.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ivey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Kelloy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Waters v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brawner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Brawner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Golden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948