Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1928No. 6023PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.

“All applications for continuances are addressed to the sound legal discretion of the court, and, if not expressly provided for, shall be granted or refused, as the ends of justice may require.” The same rule of discretion as is applicable in cases of continuances undoubtedly likewise applies where there is no motion for a continuance but merely a request for postponement. We think the very able and learned judge who presided in the trial of this case erred in treating the request or motion made by counsel for the accused as if it had been a motion for a continuance, in which the law requires…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Reliford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  4. McArver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Blackman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Fair v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  4. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API