Legal Opinion

Rydman v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 30, 1977PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in his action for breach of an oral contract of employment. The Appeals Court decided that the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict should have been granted, and they reversed the judgment. 4 Mass. App. Ct. 800 (1976). We granted further appellate review. G. L. c. 211A, § 11.

In 1959, when the plaintiff was fifty years old, he applied for and was offered a job as an engineer by the defendant company. Because of his age, he was concerned with obtaining pension benefits — which required fifteen years of service or employment until age…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Lucey v. Hero International Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Porshin v. SniderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. James F. Monaghan Inc. v. M. Lowenstein & Sons Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Braden v. Trustees of Phillips AcademyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Robert Goldman v. First National Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Boothby v. Texon, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Hinchey v. Nynex Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. Cabot Corp. v. AVX Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  5. O'Brien v. Analog Devices, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API