In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law, Made by Batter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.
The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board has held as a matter of law that the claimant, Adam Batter, did not perform work in covered employment and has disallowed his claim for unemployment insurance. Claimant was employed by The Mortgage Commission Servicing Corporation as an auditor and his employment was terminated by reason of substantial decreases in respondent’s business. The sole question involved is whether the Mortgage Commission Servicing Corporation is a governmental subdivision and exempt as an employer from the provisions of the Unemployment Insurance Law.
It is the contention of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- W. H. H. Chamberlin, Inc. v. AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- County of Herkimer v. Village of HerkimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- People Ex Rel. Gould v. . BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- In re Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Matter of Board of Educ. of City of Jamestown v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fifth District Republican Committee v. Empoyment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Merion v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Claim of Knapp v. Syracuse UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In re BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954