City of Greencastle v. Hazelett
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Putnam Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtErazer, J.
The complaint avers that Hazelett is the owner of a tract of land near Greencastle, which has peculiar value as a residence property, on account of a fine spring thereon, supplying abundant water for domestic uses; that the place has been improved, at great expense, for a residence, by the erection of valuable buildings near the spring; that the city has purchased an adjoining tract, which it is about to use for the burial of the dead; that the surface drainage of a portion of the proposed cemetery grounds leads into Hazelett’s spring; that there are also subterraneous streams passing through…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chatfield v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
- Roath v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
- Macy v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Harwood v. Benton & JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
- New Albany & Salem Railroad v. PetersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Taylor v. FickasIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- People's Gas Co. v. TynerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Lacy v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Swift & Co. v. Peoples Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Barclay v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.