Legal Opinion

New Albany & Salem Railroad v. Peterson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1860PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

J.— Complaint by the appellee against the company for an injury to a lot belonging to the plainliff, causing a well thereon to be drained by the construction of the defendants’ road. Judgment for the plaintiff for 50 dollars.

The cause was submitted to the Court on the following agreed statement of facts: “It is agreed that the plaintiff is the owner in fee of the lot described, &c.; that the defendants, in the construction of their road under Uieir charter, caused the said well mentioned in the complaint to be drained, dried up, and the water diverted therefrom, by means of which the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Livingston v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. Taylor v. FickasIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. People's Gas Co. v. TynerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Upjohn v. Board of HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API