Legal Opinion

Mictronics, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 4, 2001No. 3350PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, Chief Judge:

The South Carolina Department of Revenue (DOR) appeals an order reversing the administrative law judge’s refusal to reopen Mictronics, Inc.’s case claiming a tax exemption. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Mictronics, Inc. (Mictronics) filed a request for a contested case hearing with the Administrative Law Judge Division (ALJD) claiming it was entitled to an exemption from the South Carolina sales and use tax. Mictronics filed a prehearing statement as directed by the administrative law judge (ALJ). On March 7,1996, the parties were served with notice of a hearing scheduled…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Ledford v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Graham v. Town of LorisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Balloon Plantation, Inc. v. Head Balloons, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Thompson v. HammondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. BB & T v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Dorman v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Richland County v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. McClurg v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. McClurg v. DeatonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API