Legal Opinion

Ray v. Upjohn Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1993No. 17820PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Plaintiff sought damages for injuries to his respiratory system caused by the inhalation of fumes from a chemical manufactured and sóld by defendant. Following jury trial a verdict was received in favor of plaintiff for $1,500,000. Judgment was entered in accordance with the verdict. Defendant appeals, presenting twenty-two points relied on, three containing subparts totaling an additional twenty-two contentions. 1

Plaintiff started work at a manufacturing plant of Dayco Corporation (Dayco) in Springfield on April 7, 1962. Dayco uses chemicals, including PAPI, a chemical…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Nesselrode v. Executive Beechcraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Elmore v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. C & M DEVELOPERS, INC. v. Berbiglia, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Green v. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hazel CHISM, Patricia Meier, Mark Chism, Kent Chism, Appellants, v. W.R. GRACE & COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. Shiyr v. PinckneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Lomax v. SewellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Douglas R. TENBARGE; Lilly Tenbarge, Appellants, v. AMES TAPING; TOOL SYSTEMS, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API