Sealy Connecticut, Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Docs. 33, 68, & 75)
ARTERTON, District Judge.
The present action arises from the contamination of certain real property located in Oakville, Connecticut (the “site”). Plaintiff Sealy Connecticut, Inc. (“Sealy”) is the present owner of the property. Defendants are various entities who formerly operated industrial facilities on the site or who are alleged to stand as corporate successors to such entities. Plaintiff seeks to hold defendants liable under a variety of federal and state environmental statutes, as well as the common law of the state of Connecticut.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ascon Properties, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Starr v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut Coastal Fishermen's Ass'n v. Remington Arms Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cox v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Cornerstone Realty, Inc. v. Dresser Rand Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- Board of County Commissioners v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- Corvello v. New England Gas Co., Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2008
- Dinardo Seaside Tower, Ltd. v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.