Legal Opinion

Levi Strauss & Co. v. Connolly

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 2, 2023No. 5:22-cv-04106Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Case No. 22-cv-04106-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 10 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 11 DAVID JAMES CONNOLLY, Re: Dkt. No. 26 Defendant. 12 13 14 Plaintiff Levi Strauss & Co. (“LS&Co.”) sues defendant David James Connolly, asserting 15 federal and state law claims for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair 16 competition.1 Mr. Connolly moves to dismiss the complaint, principally on the ground that this 17 Court lacks personal jurisdiction over him. Mr. Connolly…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API