Legal Opinion

Moe v. Cagle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1963No. 36698PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dawson, J.†

Plaintiffs Edward J. Moe and wife, owners of a servient estate, sought to establish in this action that the posture of a garage located on a portion of the servient property constitutes a permissive, revocable use. Plaintiffs prevailed, and defendants Robert S. Cagle and wife, owners of the dominant estate, appeal.

The estates lie between Forest Avenue (also called 80th Avenue S.E.) and Lake Washington on Mercer Island. The elevation drops sharply from the avenue to the lake, and, in topography, forms an upper and lower level. Lying *936between these levels is a road and the site on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mallarino v. HammersmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Carroll v. BeaversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Hawkey v. WilliamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Westman v. Clifton's Brookdale, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Ponce v. MarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ball v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API