Legal Opinion

Salem v. Sun Hill Industries Inc., No. Cv93-0132447s (May 1, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 1, 1997No. CV93-0132447SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]Memorandum of Decision Re: Motion for Summary Judgment The issue before this court is whether defendant, Sun Hill Industries, Inc., was correctly subject to personal jurisdiction under Massachusetts General Laws ch. 223A, § 3.

Massachusetts General Laws ch. 223A, § 3. Transactions or conduct for personal jurisdiction, provides in pertinent part:

A court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a person, who acts directly or by agent, as to a cause of action in law or in equity arising from the person's (a) transacting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Tatro v. Manor Care, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Good Hope Industries, Inc. v. Ryder Scott Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. United Electrical Radio and MacHine Workers of America (Ue). v. 163 Pleasant Street CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Bennett v. Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API