Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Inc. v. Augustine Medical, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 26, 1992No. C-1-91-832PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HERMAN J. WEBER, District Judge.
This controversy involves two medical equipment companies battling for greater shares of the market for their medical products. Each party seeks preliminary injunctive relief preventing the other from disseminating false, misleading, inaccurate, or disparaging information to their customers.
Plaintiff Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Inc. (CSZ), an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Cincinnati, Ohio, alleges that defendants violated the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125; the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1; the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Balance Dynamics Corporation v. Schmitt Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Chandler & Associates, Inc. v. America's Healthcare Alliance, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Walker v. ConcobyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- Neveux v. Webcraft Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- Nordale, Inc. v. Samsco, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.