Legal Opinion

City of Highland Park v. Oakland County Drain Commissioner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1945No. Calendar No. 42,996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, C. J.

Plaintiff, as the owner of certain bonds of the Southfield No. 6 storm sewer drain district, began the present mandamus action to compel the treasurer of Oakland county to pay the deficiency on said bonds from the county’s general fund. Having obtained leave, it appeals from an order denying the relief sought. Questions are presented which require us to construe and determine the constitutionality of Act No. 316, chap. 10, § 15, Pub. Acts 1923, as amended by Act No. 331, Pub. Acts 1927, which provides in part:

“In case the amount available in the drain fund shall be insufficient to pay the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. University of Michigan v. PrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Bowman v. Board of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Oakland County Drain Com'r v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Moore v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. W. A. Foote Memorial Hospital, Inc v. City of Jackson Hospital AuthorityMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Connor v. HerrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Cohn v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Hazel Park Nonpartisan Taxpayers Ass'n v. Township of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API