Legal Opinion
United States v. Barrows
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1968No. 22691PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
The United States brought this action to recover damages and obtain injunctive relief in connection with the operation, by defendants, of a sand and gravel mining and processing plant on lands in the San Bernardino National Forest. The defendants include E. Arthur Barrows, locator of a mining claim for sand and gravel on such lands, and B. Robert Seaman, general manager of Big Bear Rock and Materials Company which, as lessee, conducts a sand and gravel operation on the asserted claim.
The district court entered an order denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Adams v. WitmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McComasSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Palmer v. Dredge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rees v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Barrows v. HickelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Clouser v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Charlestone Stone Products Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Cox v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.