Legal Opinion

Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McComas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 9, 1919No. 172PublishedCited by 26 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OREGON. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter

This is a suit to quiet title in the plaintiff to five small tracts of land in Umatilla County, Oregon, the right to such relief being predicated solely on adverse possession under color of title for ten years, the period prescribed in a local statute.. The plaintiff obtained a judgment, which at first was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the State and then on a petition for rehearing was modified as to two of the tracts. 82 Oregon, 639 The case is here on writ of certiorari.

There was substantial testimony tending to show that McComas, the plaintiff, and his predecessors had been in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Price CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. RustSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Brown v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Payne v. Central Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Alfred Coleman and Edward J. McClennan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API