Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Tobin

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 13487PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an action for personal injuries. Defendant owned a concrete mixer which was being operated by his employees in certain construction work. The engine broke down and plaintiff was sent by his employer, O. F. Werner, to make necessary repairs. Plaintiff worked on the engine for several hours, and when his repairs were completed, defendant’s employees put the mixer in motion to test it, and plaintiff followed closely behind to see how the engine was working. Part of the machinery consists of a container called a “skip”, in which the materials to be mixed are placed and raised to the body…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Brumhall v. SutherlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. LaPorte v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Talbert v. OstergaardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Helms v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Kiernan v. Herbert M. Baruch Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API