Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Hill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1954No. 39,214, 39,215PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

Appeals in two damage actions, identical in all respects except as to parties plaintiff and the amount of recovery, have been consolidated in this court. The issues presented are identical and a decision in one governs both appeals. We, therefore, need consider only one of them.

The actions have not been tried. Plaintiffs appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to their original petitions and from a number of rulings on motions.

In view of the conclusion we have reached concerning the order sustaining the demurrer the rulings on motions are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rowell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Emigh v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. Waddell v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Waddell v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  5. Talbott v. Farmers Union Co-Op ElevatorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sundgren v. Topeka Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  2. Steele v. RappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Russell v. American Rock Crusher Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Robinson v. MullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Lungstrum v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API