Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Longino

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2011No. 2010-1646PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Shondra Collette Longino of Mayfield Heights, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0081874, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2007. In October 2009, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a 12-count complaint charging respondent with multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct arising from her neglect of client matters; failure to keep her clients informed about the status of their cases and obtain their informed consent; improper notarization of affidavits, including the notarization of documents that were not signed, were not signed by the purported…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GerrenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. FranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Tinch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. VanBibberOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. VanBibberOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. FrendenOhio Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API