Legal Opinion

Dymond v. Bruhns

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Edmund W. Burke, Judge,’ presiding. This is a proceeding to establish a mechanic’s lien.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Edmund W. Burke, Judge,’ presiding. This is a proceeding to establish a mechanic’s lien. On December 30, 1896, the Kimball & Cobb Stone Company filed its petition in the circuit court of Cook county against DeWitt C. Butts, owner, and others, to enforce its claim for a mechanic’s lien upon certain lots numbered from 1 to 9, inclusive, in the south division of the city of Chicago. Subsequently, on February 2,1897, the petition was amended, and appellee,…

1Per curiam

On November 5, 1895, DeWitt C. Butts, being the owner of the premises in question, made a verbal contract with M. J. Boughan, through whom appellant claims, to furnish all the material and labor for, and to complete, the plumbing", gas fitting", steam heating and sewer work on an improvement, known as the “Como” building, which Butts was then erecting upon said premises. Butts agreed to pay Boughan the cost of the labor and material, and twenty-five per cent added. Boughan commenced work under his contract on' November 5, 1895, and completed it on May 2, 1896. On June 22,1896, Boughan…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Freeman v. RinakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. M. Pugh Co. v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hindert Bros. v. American Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Northbrook Supply Co. v. Thumm Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  2. Henry v. ApplegateAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API