Legal Opinion

Brader v. Minute Muffler Installation, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 6, 1996No. 35274-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C.J.

Minute Muffler Installation, Ltd. appeals the trial court’s award of attorney fees and costs to Larry and Patricia Brader (Brader) for its violations of the Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA). Minute Muffler argues that the Braders owed it attorney fees and costs for their failure to accept an offer of judgment greater than the amount they later recovered at trial. The Braders cross appeal the trial court’s exclusion of their business operating losses as part of the rescission remedy provided under FIPA. Each party also requests attorney fees on appeal under various theories.

We hold…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Allianz Insurance v. GagnonNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Schwartz v. Estate of GreenspunNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Greenwood v. StevensonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
  5. Cover v. Chicago Eye Shield Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seattle Professional Engineering Employees Ass'n v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Trotzer v. VigCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Trotzer v. VigCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. SPEEA v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Tucker v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 417Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API