Legal Opinion

People v. Sokoloff

Nassau County District Court

Decided April 17, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel Palmieri, J.

In each of the above traffic cases, the defendant has moved to dismiss the accusatory instrument, pursuant to CPL 170.30, based on the failure to timely file a supporting deposition.

CPL 100.25 (2) provides that a defendant who makes a timely request, therefore, is "entitled as a matter of right” to receive a supporting deposition containing reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed the offense charged. The court, upon receipt of the defendant’s timely request for a supporting deposition, must order service thereof within 30 days of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. KeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. Zagorsky, New York County Courts1973
  3. People v. BaronAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
  4. People v. Hust, New York County Courts1973
  5. People v. Bock, New York County Courts1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RossiJustice Court of Village of Muttontown · 1992
  2. People v. BranchinelliNassau County District Court · 1989
  3. People v. ThumserNassau County District Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API