Legal Opinion

People v. Rossi

Justice Court of Village of Muttontown

Decided May 29, 1992PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin I. Kaminsky, J.

This action raises a novel question regarding the 1985 amendment to CPL 100.25 (2). CPL 100.25 (2) provides that a defendant who has been arraigned under a simplified information is entitled to receive, "upon a timely request”, a supporting deposition of the complainant police officer or public *617servant, containing the "allegations of fact” that allegedly provide "reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed the offense or offenses charged”. Prior to 1985, the statute directed that the supporting deposition be "served upon him”, i.e., the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. People v. SkinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. NuccioNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. GreenNassau County District Court · 2002
  2. People v. QuarlesRochester City Court · 1996
  3. People v. DeLucaYonkers City Court · 1995
  4. People v. SuarezValley Stream Justice Court · 1996
  5. People v. BradyNassau County District Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API