Maison v. Confederated Tribes of Umatilla Indian Reservation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.
This case involves fishing rights of the Confederated Tribes of the Walla Walla, Cayuse and Umatilla Indians under a treaty with the United States.
The District Court had jurisdiction under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1331, relating to federal questions, and 28 U.S.C. § 2201, the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act. The provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2281, requiring a three-judge court are not applicable and trial was properly had before a single judge.1 Jurisdiction is conferred upon this court under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
It appears that late in May of 1855 a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Tulee v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Tracy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- H. G. Maison v. Confederated Tribes Of The Umatilla Indian ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Chewie v. LockDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1966
- State v. TinnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. TinnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1972