Legal Opinion

Maison v. Confederated Tribes of Umatilla Indian Reservation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1963No. 17139PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.

This case involves fishing rights of the Confederated Tribes of the Walla Walla, Cayuse and Umatilla Indians under a treaty with the United States.

The District Court had jurisdiction under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1331, relating to federal questions, and 28 U.S.C. § 2201, the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act. The provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2281, requiring a three-judge court are not applicable and trial was properly had before a single judge.1 Jurisdiction is conferred upon this court under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

It appears that late in May of 1855 a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Tulee v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Tracy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  5. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. H. G. Maison v. Confederated Tribes Of The Umatilla Indian ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Chewie v. LockDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1966
  3. State v. TinnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. TinnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API